ilmeds
Topic: authors | charity & philanthropy | csr | entrepreneurship & innovation | finance & fundraising | general | human resources | ilearn | people | policy & governance | social enterprise | technology | university research
Date: 2013 | 2014 | jan'15 | feb'15 | mar'15 | apr'15 | may'15 | jun'15 | jul'15 | aug'15 | sep'15 | oct'15 | nov'15 | dec'15 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | jan'25 | feb'25 | mar'25 | apr'25 | may'25 | jun'25 | jul'25 | aug'25 | sep'25 | oct'25 | nov'25 | dec'25 | jan'26 | feb'26 | mar'26 | apr'26
Headlines
How to master social media algorithms and grow your reach | Charity Digital, 20 aug 2026
Uzbekistan establishes legal framework for social entrepreneurship, introduces state support | DARYO, 18 aug 2026
Why charity trustees need more than management accounts | RSM UK, 17 aug 2026
How mandatory CSR helps firms boost margins and competitive advantage | Forbes India, 17 aug 2026
Scale Right, Not Cheap and Easy | Stanford Social Innovation Review, 17 aug 2026
How Corporate Talent Becomes Strategic Governance for Nonprofits | NonProfit PRO, 11 aug 2026
What is the state of volunteer management in 2026? | Charity Digital, 07 aug 2026
How nonprofit board service sharpens business leaders' strategic thinking in unexpected ways | Phoenix Business Journal, 07 aug 2026
Can blended finance help Europe keep its social innovation promise? | Alliance Magazine, 24 jul 2026
Nonprofit Organization Management in China: Research and Practice | Syracuse University Research, 01 jul 2026
If solidarity is the principle, volunteering is its discipline | United Nations, 19 jun 2026
Nonprofit communications need systems, not quick fixes | India Development Review, 10 jun 2026
June 2015
Mohammad Anas Wahaj | 09 jun 2015
Diversity in nonprofit boards and leadership is an essential element of governance. It helps in bringing different perspectives and expertise in the decision-making process and affects the culture and dynamics of the nonprofit boards. Team of researchers led by Professor Garry W. Jenkins of The Ohio State University undertook the study to understand the ways in which the composition of the nonprofit boards has evolved in recent years in US. They examined the biographies of governing directors in 1989 and 2014 of three sets of nonprofit organizations: major private research universities, elite small liberal arts colleges, and prominent New York City cultural and health institutions. According to Prof. Jenkins, 'The most striking finding was the sizable presence and growth on charitable boards of those whose primary professional background and skill set were drawn from the financial services industry. The tally indicates that the percentage of people from finance on the boards virtually doubled at all three types of nonprofits between 1989 and 2014.' Another important takeaway from the study is the presence of high percentage of board leadership positions from the finance sector (Liberal Arts Colleges - 44%, New York City Nonprofits - 44%, Private Universities - 56%). Prof. Jenkins while mentioning the 2012 figures for finance sector contribution to GDP (7.9%) and employment (6% of private non-farm workforce) explains, 'If nonprofit boards were composed of a representative group of people from society, one would expect trustees with a finance background to represent roughly 6 to 8 percent of board members. Instead, according to our research, trustees with professional backgrounds and skills primarily from the financial services industry represent about four times that number.' While answering about this shift in composition of nonprofit boards, Prof. Jenkins says, 'Nonprofit organizations are simply following the money. Driven by the heightened pressure and expectations to raise ever larger sums, nonprofit boards and managers are selecting new board members with an eye toward those with the greatest capacity for making "transformative gifts."' The dominance of financiers in the nonprofit boards also influences the working dynamics of the board with inclusion of specific practices, approaches and priorities (Data-driven decision making; Emphasis on metrics; Prioritizing impact and competition; Managing with 3-5 years horizons and plans; Advocating executive-style leadership; Compensation etc). Although these practices do have benefits for nonprofits, but at the same time too much financial and business-like emphasis in the functioning of the board may have adverse impact on charitable goals and objectives. For the long-term success and effectiveness of the nonprofit boards the need would be to balance the composition of the board with inclusion of individuals that have expertise and skills in different fields alongwith consideration of racial and gender diversity, minority representation etc. Read on...
Stanford Social Innovation Review:
The Wall Street Takeover of Nonprofit Boards
Author:
Garry W. Jenkins
Mohammad Anas Wahaj | 06 jun 2015
The relationship between the management and the nonprofit board requires an optimum balance for better performance. Management has more information, thus giving them more power, in the functioning of the organization. However to stay relevant and effective, volunteer board members need to be proactive in seeking the information not only from the management but also from the other sources. There can be adverse consequences for the organization if the board members fail in this regard. Professor Eugene Fram of Rochester Institute of Technology, suggest steps to prevent management from overriding the board - Develop an understood difference between the policy/strategy development and managing organizational operations; Governance focus; Better collaboration and communications. Read on...
Huffington Post:
Can Nonprofit Management Usurp Board Responsibilities?
Author:
Eugene Fram
©2026, ilmeps
disclaimer & privacy