ilmeds
Topic: authors | charity & philanthropy | csr | entrepreneurship & innovation | finance & fundraising | general | human resources | ilearn | people | policy & governance | social enterprise | technology | university research
Date: 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | jan'22 | feb'22 | mar'22 | apr'22 | may'22 | jun'22 | jul'22 | aug'22 | sep'22 | oct'22 | nov'22 | dec'22 | jan'23 | feb'23 | mar'23 | apr'23 | may'23 | jun'23 | jul'23 | aug'23 | sep'23 | oct'23 | nov'23 | dec'23 | jan'24 | feb'24 | mar'24 | apr'24 | may'24 | jun'24 | jul'24 | aug'24 | sep'24 | oct'24 | nov'24 | dec'24
Headlines
How will you reimagine charity services in 2025? | Charity Digital, 10 jan 2025
How Nonprofits Are Scaling Impact With AI Agents | Forbes, 10 jan 2025
Top CSR initiatives to combat hunger in India | The CSR Journal, 10 jan 2025
1How to be a brilliant social enterprise employer: Make flexible working the default | Pioneers Post, 09 jan 2025
5 Ideas For Volunteers As Fundraising Resources | The NonProfit Times, 08 jan 2025
'Keeps me grateful': how volunteering can help older adults | The Guardian, 08 jan 2025
5 Trends That Will Shape Fundraising in 2025 | The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 07 jan 2025
How OpenAI Hopes to Sever Its Nonprofit Roots | The New York Times, 17 dec 2025
An Interview with Gon Erez: Innovations in Nonprofit Management | CEOWORLD Magazine, 25 nov 2025
Empower, connect, and grow: The impact of engaging in charitable work | Nature, 15 nov 2024
January 2023
Mohammad Anas Wahaj | 31 jan 2023
According to the research by Prof. Praveen Kopalle from the Tuck School of Business (Dartmouth College), Prof. S. Arunachalam of the Rawls College of Business (Texas Tech University), Prof. Hariom Manchiraju of the Indian School of Business (ISB), and Prof. Rahul Suhag of the Kenan-Flagler Business School (University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill), what's good for society and the environment can also be good for a company's bottom line. Firms spending on CSR activities impacts their profitability. Researchers studied data from 2320 unique firms in India between the years 2012 and 2017, completing two forms of empirical analysis - (1) A difference-in-differences design, analyzed companies' CSR spending, advertising, and gross profit margins before and after the passage of the India's CSR law. (2) A regression discontinuity, looked at firms very close to law's threshold (on both sides) and compared the differences in their pricing. According to Prof. Kopalle, 'If both techniques are pointing in the same direction, then we can establish a casual inference that the law is what's making the difference.' After making data more comprehensible, researchers identified three categories of the firms - (1) Newspender: Firms that started spending on CSR after the law was passed. (2) Prosocial: Firms that spent on CSR even before the law was passed. (3) Nonspender: Firms that didn't spend on CSR after the law, and chose to explain to the government why they didn't do so. Mentioning key findings, Prof. Kopalle says, 'The Newspenders start saying more about CSR in their ads and it ends up positively impacting their gross margins...consumers reward socially responsible, profit-maximizing companies and absorb the corresponding price increases without reducing their purchase quantities...At the company level, you can do well by doing good. It's not a zero-sum game...Between using advertising and price as leverage, and having the law as a backup, it gives a cohesive and well-founded story to consumers, so they say it's worthwhile to pay more for products from these companies.' The research also provides proof that governments in emerging economies can use mandatory CSR laws as an innovative strategy to nudge companies to contribute to social causes. Read on...
Tuck School of Business News:
Corporate Social Responsibility is not a Zero-Sum Game
Author:
Kirk Kardashian
©2025, ilmeps
disclaimer & privacy