ilmeds
Topic: authors | charity & philanthropy | csr | entrepreneurship & innovation | finance & fundraising | general | human resources | ilearn | people | policy & governance | social enterprise | technology | university research
Date: 2013 | 2014 | jan'15 | feb'15 | mar'15 | apr'15 | may'15 | jun'15 | jul'15 | aug'15 | sep'15 | oct'15 | nov'15 | dec'15 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | jan'22 | feb'22 | mar'22 | apr'22 | may'22 | jun'22 | jul'22 | aug'22 | sep'22 | oct'22 | nov'22 | dec'22 | jan'23 | feb'23 | mar'23 | apr'23 | may'23 | jun'23 | jul'23 | aug'23 | sep'23 | oct'23 | nov'23 | dec'23 | jan'24 | feb'24 | mar'24 | apr'24 | may'24 | jun'24 | jul'24 | aug'24 | sep'24 | oct'24 | nov'24 | dec'24
Headlines
The dark side of 'giving': Understanding the rising 'charity scam' industry in India | The Indian Express, 17 may 2025
Volunteer is a real class act | China Daily, 17 may 2025
Why some tycoons are speeding up their charity | The Economist, 15 may 2025
Charitable giving: How families can build a philanthropic legacy | RBC Wealth Management, 15 may 2025
Corporate Social Responsibility Causing Tension | The NonProfit Times, 15 may 2025
Accelerating Impact Through Social Enterprise partnerships | Deloitte, 10 may 2025
US Nonprofit Sector Documents Its Own Powerlessness, but What Will We Do? | Nonprofit Quarterly, 06 may 2025
The Future is Collective: Advancing Collective Social Innovation to Address Society’s Biggest Challenges 2025 | World Economic Forum, 25 mar 2025
What Is Purpose-Driven Entrepreneurship: Social Entrepreneurship | Forbes, 19 mar 2025
A New Framework for Governance Duties: Loving Accountability and Abundant Resourcing | Nonprofit Quarterly, 11 feb 2025
June 2015
Mohammad Anas Wahaj | 09 jun 2015
Diversity in nonprofit boards and leadership is an essential element of governance. It helps in bringing different perspectives and expertise in the decision-making process and affects the culture and dynamics of the nonprofit boards. Team of researchers led by Professor Garry W. Jenkins of The Ohio State University undertook the study to understand the ways in which the composition of the nonprofit boards has evolved in recent years in US. They examined the biographies of governing directors in 1989 and 2014 of three sets of nonprofit organizations: major private research universities, elite small liberal arts colleges, and prominent New York City cultural and health institutions. According to Prof. Jenkins, 'The most striking finding was the sizable presence and growth on charitable boards of those whose primary professional background and skill set were drawn from the financial services industry. The tally indicates that the percentage of people from finance on the boards virtually doubled at all three types of nonprofits between 1989 and 2014.' Another important takeaway from the study is the presence of high percentage of board leadership positions from the finance sector (Liberal Arts Colleges - 44%, New York City Nonprofits - 44%, Private Universities - 56%). Prof. Jenkins while mentioning the 2012 figures for finance sector contribution to GDP (7.9%) and employment (6% of private non-farm workforce) explains, 'If nonprofit boards were composed of a representative group of people from society, one would expect trustees with a finance background to represent roughly 6 to 8 percent of board members. Instead, according to our research, trustees with professional backgrounds and skills primarily from the financial services industry represent about four times that number.' While answering about this shift in composition of nonprofit boards, Prof. Jenkins says, 'Nonprofit organizations are simply following the money. Driven by the heightened pressure and expectations to raise ever larger sums, nonprofit boards and managers are selecting new board members with an eye toward those with the greatest capacity for making "transformative gifts."' The dominance of financiers in the nonprofit boards also influences the working dynamics of the board with inclusion of specific practices, approaches and priorities (Data-driven decision making; Emphasis on metrics; Prioritizing impact and competition; Managing with 3-5 years horizons and plans; Advocating executive-style leadership; Compensation etc). Although these practices do have benefits for nonprofits, but at the same time too much financial and business-like emphasis in the functioning of the board may have adverse impact on charitable goals and objectives. For the long-term success and effectiveness of the nonprofit boards the need would be to balance the composition of the board with inclusion of individuals that have expertise and skills in different fields alongwith consideration of racial and gender diversity, minority representation etc. Read on...
Stanford Social Innovation Review:
The Wall Street Takeover of Nonprofit Boards
Author:
Garry W. Jenkins
Mohammad Anas Wahaj | 06 jun 2015
The relationship between the management and the nonprofit board requires an optimum balance for better performance. Management has more information, thus giving them more power, in the functioning of the organization. However to stay relevant and effective, volunteer board members need to be proactive in seeking the information not only from the management but also from the other sources. There can be adverse consequences for the organization if the board members fail in this regard. Professor Eugene Fram of Rochester Institute of Technology, suggest steps to prevent management from overriding the board - Develop an understood difference between the policy/strategy development and managing organizational operations; Governance focus; Better collaboration and communications. Read on...
Huffington Post:
Can Nonprofit Management Usurp Board Responsibilities?
Author:
Eugene Fram
©2025, ilmeps
disclaimer & privacy